Decisio.water

Better decisions across the
whole water system

Decisio brings connected planning intelligence to the decisions water and wastewater companies make across investment, resilience, regulation, asset strategy, capital delivery and operations.

Explore. Compare. Adapt. Decide.

Built around the

Decisions you make

  • Finance

    Capital allocation, performance & financing

  • Risk & Resilience

    System resilience & consequence of failure

  • Regulation

    Comprehensive, defensible business planning

  • Asset Management & Strategy

    Optimised, integrated investment planning

  • Capital Delivery

    Rapid feasibility & adaptive project sequencing

  • Operations

    Predictive & responsive performance improvement

Whole-system planning for resilient water infrastructure

Better decisions across the whole water system.

How Decisio supports the decision

Explore. Compare. Adapt. Decide.

One connected journey from understanding the system to committing to a plan you can defend.

1

Explore

Understand the system, constraints, dependencies and possible futures.

2

Compare

Test options and scenarios across cost, performance, risk and outcomes.

3

Adapt

Update plans as assumptions, priorities and conditions change.

4

Decide

Make transparent, defensible decisions with a clear understanding of trade-offs.

Applications of .water

Planning each part of the water system separately cannot answer the questions water companies are now being asked. These applications bring the whole system into one adaptive model.

  • Water Systems Management Planning
  • Wastewater Systems Management Planning
  • Drainage Systems Management Planning
  • Integrated Bioresources Planning
  • Leakage & Network Strategy
  • Catchment Investment Optimisation

Optimise water investment with whole-system planning intelligence

Asset Planning

Capital Investment & Asset Planning

Prioritise capital maintenance and enhancement spend across the asset base, linking risk, condition, criticality and customer outcome in a single auditable framework.

Network Optimisation

Leakage Strategy & Network Optimisation

Identify, target and sequence leakage intervention spatially and temporally to meet regulatory targets at minimum whole-life cost.

Wastewater Planning

Storm Overflow & Surface Water Management

Model the cost, benefit and sequencing of overflow improvements across the sewer network, demonstrating regulatory and environmental compliance.

Resilience Planning

Water Systems Planning & Resilience

Develop adaptive Water Resource Management Plans under multiple climate and demand scenarios, testing supply-demand balance robustly.

Business Planning

Business Planning & Regulatory Investment

Construct evidence-based, outcome-linked PR submissions connecting asset need, investment cost and ODI performance to a coherent customer-funded programme.

Environmental Planning

Environmental Programme Planning & Delivery

Optimise WINEP and NEP delivery schedules, balancing environmental improvement obligations against capital efficiency and operational readiness.

Integrated Whole-system Asset & Regulatory Strategy - Catchment · Networks · Wastewater · Regulation · Retail

Connect capital investment, operational performance, environmental compliance and customer bill impact into one adaptive model - enabling water companies to build, test and defend a holistic PR strategy that holds up under Ofwat scrutiny and evolves through the AMP cycle.

How .water works

Temporal, Spatial & Financial Planning

Deliver data-driven planning of water and wastewater infrastructure across the end-to-end water value chain, combining all three dimensions simultaneously.

Stakeholder Collaboration

Align the objectives and responsibilities of National, Regional, Water Company and Local planners, enabling better, faster and more connected decisions.

Adaptive Planning

Update plans within hours rather than weeks when conditions change - keeping water programmes on track through regulatory, climate and operational shifts.

Mass Scenario Analysis

Amplify scenario analysis from 10s to 10,000+ using AI-powered Mass Scenario Analysis - a step-change in asset investment and regulatory planning insights.

Outcomes for water companies

UK Water Utility - Leakage & Investment Optimisation

Significant financial and operational improvements for a major UK water utility, including leakage penalty savings and prevention of billions in stranded asset costs.

  • £9.1m leakage penalty savings
  • £3.8m Opex reduction
  • 70% cost reduction through proactive options
Discuss this case study →

Australian Water Utility - 30-Year Investment Plan

2 billion AUD in stranded asset costs prevented through auto-generation of network options, and a 26% reduction in the 30-year core investment plan.

  • 2bn AUD ($1.3bn) stranded assets prevented
  • 26% reduction in 30-year plan (17bn AUD)
  • 97% net carbon emission reduction by 2045
Discuss this case study →

Scottish Water - Dalmuir Wastewater Catchment Strategy

Rapid whole-system scenario analysis helped Scottish Water compare competing investment choices across one of Scotland’s most complex wastewater catchments.

  • 20 scenarios modelled and compared to 2050
  • 25-30% Opex reduction from an MBBR treatment upgrade
  • 35% catchment removal needed to match the same savings
Read the case study →

All customer outcomes →

WASTEWATER

Helping Scottish Water identify the right long-term investment strategy for Dalmuir

Rapid whole-system scenario analysis helped Scottish Water compare competing investment choices across one of Scotland’s most complex wastewater catchments.

The challenge

How do you know which intervention will deliver the greatest value across an entire wastewater system?

The Dalmuir wastewater treatment works (WWTW) catchment serves a large area of Greater Glasgow and faces increasing pressure from population growth, climate change and environmental obligations.

Scottish Water needed to make a strategic choice. Should flows be redirected away from Dalmuir WWTW? Should the treatment process itself be upgraded? How much difference could investment in SuDS make? And what would each choice mean for operational expenditure, CSO spills, sewer flooding and the wider Bioresource Strategy?

Answering those questions meant looking beyond individual assets and understanding how different investment choices would interact across the catchment.

20scenarios modelled and compared to 2050

The solution

Rapidly comparing fundamentally different investment choices at whole-system level

Using Decisio™ Wastewater Systems, BMA created a connected digital representation of the Dalmuir catchment and rapidly tested alternative future configurations.

Twenty scenarios were compared, combining different catchment configurations with alternative treatment-process choices. Decisio also identified and quantified potential SuDS interventions across 20 priority drainage zones.

This allowed Scottish Water to see not only what each intervention could achieve individually, but the trade-offs between fundamentally different investment strategies.

35%catchment removal would be required to match the operational savings achieved by upgrading the treatment process to MBBR

The impact

Greater confidence in where investment can make the biggest difference

The analysis established MBBR as the clear strategic priority for Dalmuir.

Across the scenarios modelled, the MBBR upgrade consistently reduced operational expenditure by 25-30%. The analysis also showed that SuDS could play an important supporting role, while catchment reconfiguration alone would not solve Dalmuir’s CSO spill and sewer-flooding challenges.

By bringing these choices together, Scottish Water gained a clearer evidence base for its long-term catchment strategy - and greater confidence in where investment could deliver the greatest value.

25-30%reduction in Opex from MBBR across the scenarios modelled

Looking at the whole system

Looking at the whole system changes the investment conversation

The Dalmuir case study shows why wastewater investment decisions cannot always be made asset by asset.

When planners can rapidly compare different interventions across the wider system, they can test assumptions, understand trade-offs and identify where investment is most likely to deliver the outcomes they need.

Who you will be working with

Max Fini, MEng

Max Fini, MEng

Head of Client Demand, Water Sector

Max leads Decisiou{2019}s commercial work across the UK water sector, bringing a water science background to the way utilities plan, operate and invest.

Andrea L. Garduño Jiménez, PhD

Andrea L. Garduño Jiménez, PhD

Wastewater Systems Solutions Owner

Read bio
Dr Kasia Szymanska

Dr Kasia Szymanska

Customer Success Leader

Read bio
Graeme Baker

Graeme Baker

Enterprise Account Manager

Read bio
Oliver Sandrove

Oliver Sandrove

Enterprise Account Manager

Read bio

See .water in action

Bring us the decision you are working through and we will show you how Decisio would approach it.